Ceasefire Resolution

Dear Friends, 

In a significant local victory for those opposing the ongoing assault by the Israeli military on Gaza, the Cambridge City Council on January 29 unanimously passed a Policy Order calling for a negotiated ceasefire.

Cambridge joined 47 other U.S. municipalities, including Somerville, San Francisco, Seattle, Detroit, Atlanta, Providence, and Chicago, which previously passed resolutions in support of aceasefire in Gaza. The Cambridge debate received extensive local press coverage, which is linked on the last page of this message.

The text of the resolution, with amendments, can be accessed here:

Hundreds of Cambridge residents demonstrated at City Hall, signed up to speak, sent in letters, or called our city councilors to plead for an end to the killing in the Gaza Strip. We’re proud to say that members of the Cambridge Residents Alliance were a vocal and determined part of that effort. 

A letter from the CResA Board in support of a ceasefire resolution was published prior to the Council debate in the Cambridge Day. 

While the final vote was contentious, the Council was ultimately able to agree on this important resolution.  We are grateful to Councilors Sumbul Siddiqui, Ayesha Wilson, Marc McGovern, and Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler for sponsoring the Policy Order. Councilor Patty Nolan offered several motions which were contrary to the spirit of the Order, and which the Cambridge Residents Alliance opposed. They included:

• Inserting a description of Hamas as a “terrorist organization.” This political commentary undercut a statement about the urgency to protect all human life and ignored both the history of state violence by Israel in Gaza and the critical role Hamas will play as a party to any ceasefire. Unfortunately, this amendment passed. 
• Removing from the Order the estimated numbers of Palestinians killed, wounded, or displaced since the bombardment began. As grounds for this proposed amendment Councilor Nolan cited her objection to the reporting by public health officials in Gaza, which is accepted as accurate, if not an undercount, by U.S. government officials, the E.U., the U.N., and all papers of record, including the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. Fortunately, the proposed amendment failed.
• Attempting to block an amendment proposed by Councilor Siddiqui that accurately characterized the Israeli military assault on Gaza as “disproportionate.” In fact, the Israeli army’s own strategy documents have called since 2008 for “disproportionate force,” an approach that has been reflected for the last 15 years in civilian casualty figures in the Gaza Strip. Fortunately, this motion failed and the Israeli assault on Gaza was described in the Order as “disproportionate.”
• Adding a clause that characterized the policy order as merely “symbolic” and not truly authoritative or effective in opposing the violence underway in Gaza. Unfortunately, this amendment passed.

Councilors Paul Toner, Joan Pickett and Mayor Denise Simmons, mostly supported Councilor Nolan’s motions to weaken the Order.

The last of these motions has broader implications, and is deeply objectionable to many of our members. Urged on by its constituents, the Cambridge City Council has a long and proud history of passing resolutions in support of humanitarian and progressive causes. These have ranged from the struggle against apartheid in South Africa to the liberation movements in Central America to the nuclear disarmament campaigns during the Cold War and beyond. We consider such actions not only to be necessary from a moral perspective (going on record that we will not be bystanders), but effective, helping build a nationwide movement of localities to challenge the decisions of our federal government. 

To say that we alone cannot change the policies of the Netanyahu government, or even the Biden Administration’s support for Israel’s actions, is like saying that one person casting a vote cannot determine the outcome of an election. Of course, this is true. But it does not mean that we should not vote. Such an understanding has deep roots in American constitutional law, including Justice John Marshall’s 1819 statement that national decisions must start from the local level, because ‘the American people cannot be compounded into one common mass.’

Again, we applaud our City Council for doing the right thing in the end. We welcome all the councilors as partners in the movement for peace and healing in the time ahead. Thanks to our members for your hard work and advocacy on this issue!

In solidarity, 

The Gaza Working Group of the Cambridge Residents Alliance Executive Committee

Press coverage of the Cambridge ceasefire Policy Order: 

The Cambridge Day:

The Boston Globe:

The Harvard Crimson:

A statement by Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley about the Cambridge and Somerville Gaza ceasefire resolutions is here:

An article about resolutions by other U.S. municipalities in support of a Gaza ceasefire is here:

Send comments to <[email protected]>.

2023 Platform

Cambridge Residents Alliance 2023 Platform:

Who we are

The Cambridge Residents Alliance was formed in 2012 to advocate for a livable, affordable, and diverse city by fighting the displacement and gentrification that have accompanied the city’s rapidly rising housing prices.  As neighbors and volunteer community activists, we seek to create local impacts in the fields of affordable housing, human rights, urban land use, community development, civic engagement, environmental justice, education, new concepts of public safety, privacy, and more. 

What we believe

Our platform asserts everyone should have a voice to shape every aspect of their environment, especially those people with historic roots in Cambridge and those communities which have been historically marginalized by class or race. We advocate for a city government that offers support throughout a resident’s lifespan, from early childhood to old age.

A. We believe in a commitment to safe, stable and AFFORDABLE HOUSING options citywide driven by need, as opposed to real estate market forces that see housing as a commodity to be created and sold for profit.

B. We believe in a strong PARTICIPATORY MUNICIPAL DEMOCRACY built on electoral representation and grassroots engagement in which all residents have full access to information about and influence on the important decisions that shape our lives, with a special focus on historically under-represented voices.  The city’s leadership must encourage local efforts to empower residents’ voices and strengthen their capacity to self-organize community-based responses to needs that are not being met.

C. We believe that the health and quality of life of all residents depends on a planned SUSTAINABLE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT that includes citywide outdoor public spaces and trees and that reduces the city’s contribution to climate change. 

D. We believe that a thriving city requires planning for and implementation of dependable, accessible, balanced  and varied modes of TRANSPORTATION, TRANSIT AND MOBILITY, including more local investment in public forms of mass transit based on a range of needs.

E. We believe in PUBLIC SAFETY programs for all residents and neighborhoods that prioritize new models of demilitarized/unarmed policing and the creation and support of civilian responses to crises, all of which minimize surveillance and promote civilian oversight.

F. We believe that Cambridge deserves robust EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES that nurture all members of the community throughout their life cycle and throughout the year, including deep investment in universal access to age zero to five full day education, after-school and out-of-school-time options for all students and maximize adult and elder learning opportunities. We oppose the high-stakes MCAS test.

G. We believe that all families in Cambridge, particularly at-risk families, should have access to CARE SYSTEMS AND INCOME ENHANCEMENT throughout the life cycle. Universal access to high-quality and enriching childcare is essential for the flourishing of younger generations in Cambridge, and a prerequisite for economic contributions by working parents. Support for quality of care should extend to affordable elder care. 

POLICIES:

A. We believe in a commitment to safe, stable and AFFORDABLE HOUSING options citywide that are driven by need, not by real estate market forces that see housing as a commodity to be created and sold for profit.

1. Offer city subsidies such as zoning changes only to support development projects that have a majority of neighborhood resident support, have an enforceable Community Benefits Agreement negotiated with residents, and provide living wage jobs. 
2. Reject adding density and height to create 80% luxury housing without significant additional community benefits.
3. Create additional stable public and non-profit low, moderate and middle-income affordable housing, including through limited-equity co-ops and community land trusts.
4. Support the creation of public “Social Housing” that is publicly -financed, publicly owned  permanent housing and that is affordable to a range of incomes.
5. Enable the Affordable Housing Trust (AHT) to develop a locally-based voucher plan and expand the AHT Board to include people impacted by the lack of affordable housing.
6. Increase funding for affordable housing, including by passing a real estate transfer fee on commercial and residential sales.
7. Use public land only for 100% affordable housing and green or open space.
8. Pass and enforce regulations to reduce displacement of tenants caused by condo conversion, AirBnB usage, unreasonable rent increases, and no-fault evictions. 
9. Support tenant organizing efforts for protections and rights such as rent control/stabilization and the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act.
10. Establish a fully staffed and funded Office of Housing Stability to research, collect data, develop and implement anti-displacement policies and services, including the needed support for eligible individuals to actually access Section 8 Housing or an inclusionary unit.
11. Require universities and colleges, particularly MIT, to provide meaningful increases in grad student and post-doctoral housing as a condition for zoning increases, in addition to contributing a higher Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) share to support affordable housing.
12. Refocus the Community Development Dept. to prioritize creative solutions to housing and land use that benefit the city’s residents, rather than enabling and promoting the plans of developers.
13. Support unhoused people’s efforts for recognition and to create permanent non-congregate housing options with no preconditions for entry, voluntary supportive services and comprehensively trained staff. 
14. Add affected community members to the Board of the Affordable Housing Trust and enable the AHT to fund city vouchers.
15. Because lab development outcompetes market and affordable housing, prevent lab development in our squares and major corridors to reduce displacement, increase housing, and maintain small businesses.

B. We believe in a strong PARTICIPATORY MUNICIPAL DEMOCRACY built on electoral representation and grassroots engagement in which all residents have full access to information about and influence on the important decisions that shape our lives, with a special focus on historically under-represented voices.  The city’s leadership must encourage local efforts to empower residents’ voices and strengthen their capacity to self-organize community-based responses to needs that are not being met.

1. All candidates for City Council must pledge to refuse campaign contributions from any large corporate or real estate interests that are seeking zoning changes or other benefits from the Cambridge City Council or city boards. This will enable voters to be more confident that councilors prioritize residents’ interests.
2. Plan, fund and build the infrastructure for affordable access to high-speed internet for all residents and small businesses; a digital equity-only response does not create true equal access for all.  
3. Maintain virtual access to all municipal meetings and create methods for residents to express their views in a variety of ways that encourage engagement and a wide range of voices.
4. Establish a data-driven approach to community outreach, and track which approaches work best, such as establishing regular city-funded, city-wide ”community canvass” outreach methods to households to surface issues, and forums representing many community voices. 
5. Invest substantially in outreach methods that assist and support neighborhood and other groups with outreach to diverse residents to broaden and increase participation.

C. We believe that the health and quality of life of all residents depends on a planned SUSTAINABLE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT that includes citywide outdoor public spaces and trees, that recognizes the importance of environmental justice, and that reduces the city’s contribution to climate change. 

1. Take the next steps toward net zero carbon emissions in Cambridge, including passing a proposed amendment to BEUDO requiring new commercial buildings to achieve net zero by 2030 instead of 2050; and creating standards and assistance for decarbonizing new and existing residential buildings.  
2. Reduce emissions from vehicular traffic by promoting use of public transit, walking, and biking; promoting electric vehicles (private and public, including trucks and buses); and enforcing anti-idling laws.
3. Establish forward thinking infrastructure standards and plans to protect residents from flooding and predicted sea-level rise. 
4. Protect residents from escalating heat through implementation of the Urban Forest Master Plan and the updated Tree Protection Ordinance, including increasing the fine for removing trees on private property that shade public spaces and protecting the tree canopy with state-of-the-art irrigation systems.
5. Build more heat protection structures such as the “CloudHouse Shade Pavilion” in Greene-Rose Heritage Park and continue Cambridge's commitments to creating more Miyawaki Forests.
6. Support and promote a city Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) and Electrify Cambridge.

D.  We believe that a thriving city requires planning for and implementation of dependable, accessible, balanced and varied modes of TRANSPORTATION, TRANSIT AND MOBILITY, including more local investment in public forms of mass transit based on a range of needs.

1. Work with statewide advocates and our elected Representatives and Senators to pressure the state to fully fund, modernize, and expand the services of the MBTA, including a new commuter rail stop at Alewife. 
2. Develop a plan that creates a balance among the many transportation and mobility needs of residents including bicyclists, walkers, and those needing to drive, which can also support small local businesses dependent on parking, through consultation with neighborhoods and comprehensive planning.
3. Provide city-funded transportation in areas of Cambridge underserved by the MBTA. 

E. We believe in PUBLIC SAFETY programs for all residents and neighborhoods that prioritize new models of demilitarized/unarmed policing and the creation and support of civilian responses to crises, all of which minimize surveillance and promote civilian oversight.

1. Provide city contracts and dispatch opportunities to implement the Cambridge Holistic Emergency Alternative Response Team (HEART), a community-based and staffed non-police-based emergency response team. 
2. Remove all military grade equipment (weapons and tools) from police, including tear gas.
3. Reject stationary cameras and surveillance methods which target impacted communities.
4. Shift non-criminal police-based work (crossing guards, traffic and parking enforcement, construction site details, school resource officers) to well-paying civilian jobs. 
5. Implement a new independent police review board accountable to civil society, where complaints that are evaluated and reported out by resident members, not police.
6. Enforce police accountability through the collective bargaining process by such measures as requiring individual officers to carry professional liability insurance.

F. We believe that Cambridge deserves robust EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES that nurture all members of the community throughout their life cycle and throughout the year, including deep investment in universal access to age zero to five full day education, after-school and out-of-school-time options for all students and maximize adult and elder learning opportunities. We oppose the high-stakes MCAS test, especially as a graduation requirement, because it narrows curriculum, promotes rote learning, undermines rather than supports struggling students, and has been exposed for its failure to close the "achievement" gap. 

1. Work through DHSP to support and develop free full day universal Pre-K and to support private daycare for infants and very young children, ensuring adequate enrichment.
2. Expand municipal funding and organizational support for free high-quality after-school and out-of-school-time options for all school-aged children. 
3. Expand community-based education and opportunities for learning for adults, especially culturally and linguistically diverse communities and elderly residents. 
4. Support coordination between Cambridge Public Libraries and other institutions for adult and childhood education on STEAM and other educational activities. 
5. Increase access to the variety of university campus resources for Cambridge residents, including cultural and intellectual offerings and some access to academic courses, and incentivize university participation in city-wide enrichment and after-school programs. 

G. We believe that all families in Cambridge, particularly at-risk families, should have access to CARE SYSTEMS AND INCOME ENHANCEMENT throughout the life cycle. Universal access to high-quality and enriching childcare is essential for the flourishing of younger generations in Cambridge, and a prerequisite for economic contributions by working parents. Support for quality of care should extend to affordable elder care.

1. Offer supplemental assistance to support family resiliency and healthy child development for families at risk of interacting with the child protection system.
2. Improve timely access to community-based behavioral health supports to address effects of domestic violence and childhood trauma.
3. Strengthen community-based resources for families to access locally designed supports outside the child welfare system (such as home visiting programs, 2-1-1 service navigators, family resource centers), and ensure the most at-risk families are connected to these resources.
4. Design and implement municipal supplemental financial support for elder care, whether in the home or in community settings.
5. Evaluate and expand the Mayor’s Rise Up Cambridge program, which provides $500 per month for 18 months to Cambridge families living below 250% of the Federal Poverty Line.

 

Join Us Today

The Cambridge Residents Alliance is committed to preserving and promoting the livable, affordable, and diverse Cambridge community. We are for the development that benefits communities, not tears them apart; development that contributes to the social, economic, political and cultural progress of people; and for development that affirms the right of people to shape their communities and destinies. We work to increase public participation in governance and policy-making at the neighborhood level and citywide through education, organizing and impacting elected officials.

Sign up

Join Cambridge Residents Alliance

Sign up

2021 Charter Reform Questions

         There are three important questions on the ballot about reform to the city charter, which describes Cambridge's form of city government. These questions are the beginning of work to change the charter and make our Cambridge government more responsive.  Many voters do not know about the ballot questions, so please share this info widely on neighborhood lists and with your friends.

City Charter Reform 
Help make our City Charter more democratic

VOTE YES on Ballot Questions 1, 2, & 3:

#1 Ends the City Manager’s sole control of all board & commission appointments by requiring Council approval;

#2 Creates an annual City Council review of the City Manager’s performance;

#3 Mandates a review of the City’s form of government every 10 years, starting in 2022. (There has been no review in 80 years.)

These questions are a beginning and it would be a big step forward for them to pass.  They are binding resolutions, and would go into effect January 1, 2022.

All eight of the incumbent councillors who are running for re-election urge a YES vote on all three questions.  Most groups are calling for Yes on all three ballot questions, including ABC, CResA, ORC, and DSA.

More info:

Many people are frustrated with the way the city is run.  We elect 9 city councilors, who elect the mayor from among themselves, and the councilors appoint the city manager.  Under our Plan E form of government, the City Manager (CM) has most of the power.  The CM appoints all the members of boards and commissions in the city, and they have not been representative of the community.  And much that the City Council passes does not get done if the CM doesn't want to do it.

One example that resonates so much now, especially with Covid, is the CM's opposition to pursuing municipal broadband.  Despite years of panels and city council votes, the CM has dragged his feet on getting a feasibility study and we are still stuck with a Comcast monopoly that is expensive and lacking in customer service.  

Some people want to consider bigger changes in the charter, such as: Should Cambridge elect the Mayor directly?  Should we have some Councilors represent Wards and some be elected citywide, instead of all being elected citywide as they are now?  Should the City Council have more power than it currently does?  Please help pass the three initial changes and then there will be a participatory public discussion of other changes.

If you have any questions or concerns on the ballot questions, please email [email protected] .

Thanks for taking action!

Lee Farris, Jonathan King, Shelley Riemann, Richard Goldberg, and Phyllis Bretholtz for the Executive Committee of the Cambridge Residents Alliance: Working for a Livable, Affordable and Diverse Cambridge

https://www.cambridgeresidentsalliance.org/

 

1.  If you want to give out literature on Election Day or want a CResA yard sign, please contact [email protected]

 

PPS. Much of the language in this alert came from our member Rena Leib- many thanks!

 

 

 

Public Education forum 9/23/20

Towards a Vision of Student Health, Wellness, and Racial Justice in Cambridge Public Schools.

On behalf of the Cambridge Residents Alliance, Our Revolution Cambridge, and Citizens for Public Schools, thanks to everyone who joined us for our recent panel discussion, "Towards a Vision of Student Health, Wellness, and Racial Justice in Cambridge Public Schools.”

More than 100 people joined the Zoom meeting to listen to and engage with the powerful and dynamic panelists. For those who were unable to join us, we are pleased to share the video of the event [link].

Here are some highlights from the six panelists. Watch the video [link] for the full panel discussion.

Cambridge School Committee member Ayesha Wilson, a product of the Cambridge Public Schools and now a youth program developer at CRLS, spoke about what it takes to create safe, equitable systems and the need for Cambridge schools to adopt contingency plans during the pandemic. She asked what it means to be an anti-racist school district and shared the example of fellow panelist Betsy Preval using A Raisin in the Sun to teach anti-racism to her students.

Betsy Preval, Director of the National Education Association Massachusetts, Cambridge Education Association Board member and on the leadership team of Educators of Color,  has been an English teacher in Cambridge for eight years. She said we have a society of haves and have nots by design, not by accident. While COVID has created new problems, many of these problems were not caused by but exacerbated by the pandemic. She spoke of the need to have meaningful shared power with marginalized youth and families of color and to bring an intersectional perspective to the work of anti-racism in education.

Kini Udovicki, born and raised in Cambridge, has been a school adjustment counselor for the last 19 years, and has worked at the Cambridge Street Upper School since 2012. She is a cultural proficiency seminar facilitator and Co-Founder of the Friday Night Hype mentoring program for Cambridge students. She addressed the need to Integrate social-emotional learning with anti-racist teaching.  She said this anti-racist work should happen across the district, affecting the choices of literature, how math is taught, and how history and science can be integrated into anti-racist teaching.

Emie Michaud Weinstock, a Haitian, Black mother of two, is a founding organizer of Cambridge Families of Color Coalition (CFCC) with a long history of advocating for racial justice in Cambridge schools. She described Building Equity Bridges, which seeks to eradicate nine barriers to racial equity. She named white privilege, bias and lack of coherence, all of which have inequitable impacts in the district. She said CFCC has demanded regular meetings with The Superintendent and shared advocacy skills to empower folks to attend school committee meetings and join the Superintendent’s working groups.

Cambridge Rindge and Latin School (CRLS) Senior Leo Austin-Spooner is one of the co-presidents of the student body as well as co-president of Project 10-East, CRLS’s gender-sexuality alliance. He served on the Superintendent’s COVID-19 Task Force as well as the CPSD Student Task Force to help advocate for students during the school-reopening process. Leo said returning to school has been anxiety-provoking for students, with constant, stressful last-minute changes.  If administrators are not going to be accountable to meet students’ needs, he said, student government is looking at what they can control. They’re looking at what makes an equitable, anti-racist school. To support students, they created a community resource directory with information on where to find academic support. He called for uplifting black excellence and black joy, black heroes and scholars, and dismantling the centering of white narratives.

Lisa Guisbond, Executive Director, Citizens for Public Schools and author of numerous articles in the NYT, Boston Globe, and elsewhere, linked anti-racist work with the fight against high stakes standardized testing.  She quoted author Ibram X. Kendi, who said “Standardized tests have become the most effective racist weapon ever devised to objectively degrade Black minds and legally exclude their bodies.” Kendi says that to be an antiracist, is to work to expose and eradicate such ideas wherever you encounter them. So antiracist work must include the fight against testing policies that disproportionately negatively impact students and communities of color. CPS [link] continues to do this work and invites others to join them.

 

Drew King, Nella LaRosa Waters, Shelley Rieman, Lisa Guisbond, and our affiliates at CRA, ORC and CPS

'17 Election Flyer

2017 CAMBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATES
Endorsed by the Cambridge Residents Alliance:

L to R - Dennis Carlone, Sumbul Siddiqui, Vatsady Sivongxay, Jan Devereux, Quinton Zondervan

5 unique perspectives and skill sets -- together they represent our future.
VOTE ALL 5 ON NOVEMBER 7th IN THE ORDER OF YOUR CHOICE
for a truly progressive City Council majority
 Quinton Zondervan is President of Green Cambridge, a bold business leader and environmental
advocate who uses his technical and organizing skills to take local action on climate change.
 Vatsady Sivongxay is an attorney, community advocate, and refugee immigrant who knows how
to take problems to solutions through policy development and community engagement Sumbul
Siddiqui is a native Cantabrigian, attorney, and CRLS graduate who grew up in public and
subsidized housing. She provides legal services to low-income communities.
 Jan Devereux was endorsed by the Alliance and elected in her first run for office in 2015 based
on her development and leadership of the very effective Fresh Pond Residents Alliance.
 Dennis Carlone was first endorsed by the Alliance and elected in 2013 and again in 2015. As an
architect and urban designer, he fought for, and secured the comprehensive Envision Cambridge
planning study now underway.
(listed above in reverse alphabetical order)

These candidates represent the diversity in our city and the transparency we need for a Cambridge that
serves all its residents. They prioritize housing for low, moderate and middle-income folks, as well as transit
and environment policies that put sustainability, livability, and affordability first. Each has pledged to
refuse campaign donations from large corporate or real estate interests that are seeking zoning
changes or other benefits from city council or boards.

******************************************************
RALLY WITH RESIDENTS ALLIANCE AND CANDIDATES
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2 PM
SONIA'S - 10 BROOKLINE ST. , CENTRAL SQUARE
*************************
See the full Residents Alliance 2017 Platform on our web site.
The Cambridge Residents Alliance
is an all-volunteer citywide organization formed in 2012 to work for a livable, affordable and diverse Cambridge and
promotes resident involvement in civic life and accountability by all city officials and departments to the city’s residents.
Sign up on the website to join the email list, or email to get involved in this election.
www.cambridgeresidentsalliance.org [email protected]

Public Transit Battles Heat Up as MBTA

Hikes Fares

by John MacDougall, John Ratliff  and Jonathan King

Ignoring the testimony of hundreds of pubic transit passengers and dozens of community organizations, the MBTA Fiscal Advisory Board voted recently to increase fares an average of more than 9% for its buses, subways and commuter rail trains.

The increases extend to monthly passes high school students use to get to and from school. These fare hikes fall unfairly on those least able to afford them, and represent a regressive tax.

At the same time the Board raised fares, they cut services, most notably the late night service heavily used by hospital and restaurant workers.

Testifying at the Feb. 29 MBTA hearing, Jean Cronin, 74, of Central Square, active in the Mass Senior Action Council, spoke for many seniors in noting that the fare hike will be a serious burden for people like herself who still need public transportation to get to work. Social security recipients did not receive any cost-of-living increases in their checks this year.

Representatives from a number of Community Heath Care Centers explained that efficient public transit was absolutely critical for their clients to access adequate health care.

“Every business, institution and entity in the Greater Boston area either depends upon or benefits in some way from the public transit functions of the MBTA,” argued Jonathan King, speaking on behalf of the Cambridge Residents Alliance.

Studies from Transportation for Massachusetts and the T-Riders Union showed that the State Legislature had appropriated sufficient funds to cover the immediate deficits, without fare hikes.

The increased fares can only decrease ridership: they will push T and rail passengers who have access to autos back into using them. The shift back to cars will increase the burning of gasoline and hurt efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow global warming.

The failure of the T and commuter rail during the heavy snow last winter has brought public transit problems into sharp relief. Traveling to, from, and through Cambridge has grown increasingly difficult in recent years. Given the regional importance of the Red Line, the bus lines and major vehicular routes, congestion in Cambridge causes serious problems not only for Cambridge residents, but for people throughout the Greater Boston area.         

Intense struggles are currently under way over:

• Whether the MBTA fare increases can be rescinded;
• Whether the desperately needed Green Line extension through Somerville—long  planned and fully designed—will be funded (see Connolly article in this issue of Neighborhood Voices);
• Whether the federal and state capital funds needed for new Red Line cars, signal equipment, and power supplies will be appropriated.

On the recommendation of our Public Transit Committee (Torgun Austen, Mike Connolly, chair, Jonathan King, John MacDougall, and John Ratliff) the Cambridge Residents Alliance has joined with two of the coalitions addressing these vital issues: Transportation for Massachusetts and the T-Riders Union. Both groups oppose fare increases as a means of financing regional MBTA service.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The authors are members of  the Transit/Traffic Committee of Cambridge Residents Alliance and the Mass Budget for All Campaign. John MacDougall works with the 350Ma Transportation Group and the Climate Working Group of Mass Peace Action. John Ratliff is Secretary of Mass Senior Action, and active with the Budget for All and Raise-Up campaigns. Jonathan King is V-P of Cambridge Residents Alliance and works on Transit issues with the Budget for All Coalition and Mass Peace Action.

 [To return to the e-Newsletter, move or close this window]

 

Join the Cambridge Residents Alliance

       The Cambridge Residents Alliance is committed to preserving and promoting a livable, affordable, and diverse Cambridge community. We are for development that benefits communities, not tears them apart; development that contributes to the social, economic, political and cultural progress of people; and for development that affirms the right of people to shape their communities and destinies. We work to increase public participation in governance and policy-making at the neighborhood level and citywide through education, organizing and impacting elected officials. By joining you indicate your  support for the above mission.

     The organization holds monthly public meetings, periodically sponsor public forums addressing pressing Cambridge issues, and send out useful updates and information through e-mail to members. Voting on organizational business requires making an annual dues donation of $10.00 or more. Member's donations provide the financial support needed to sustain communications and education. Names and donations are public information and reported annually to the Commonwealth.

     

Sign up

Make a Donation

In working for a livable, affordable, and diverse Cambridge.   Your donations and membership fees provide the entire budget. Our expenses include printing platforms, leaflets, website maintenance, internet service, state filing fees, and meeting room rentals. All work is volunteer. We receive no foundation support, and do not solicit or accept contributions from real estate developers or private corporations.

Thank you.

Donate